EvalHum

Working for the SSH
  • Home
  • About
  • RESSH
    • RESSH 2015






  • Related Projects and Events
    • ENRESSH

    • How do you survive evaluation? International workshop for young researchers in the social sciences and humanities, Geneva, 14 to 17 September 2016

    • STI 2016 14-16 September 2016, Valencia

    • Biennial conference of the European Evaluation Society (EES), 28-30 September 2016, Maastricht (NL)

    • The Co-Production of Emerging Bodies, Politics and Technologies, 12-14 October 2016, Bergen, Norway

    • Colloque du G3: la qualité dans l’enseignement supérieur, 12-14 October 2016, Geneva, Switzerland

    • International conference on R&D policy, 24/25 November 2016, Vienna, Vienna (AT)

  • Links
  • Contact

RESSH 2015

Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and Humanities Conference

Qualitative and Quantitative Indicators for Performance and Social Impact under Scrutiny

Inter-MSH QualiSHS
EvalHum
Maison des sciences de l'homme de Bretagne
Campus Villejean
Rennes

4-6 June 2015

RESSH 2015 was the first of the RESSH conference series organised by the EvalHum Initiative.

Below is the list of papers by session with links to presentations, when available.

Keynote Speakers
  • Johannes ANGERMULLER, University of Warwick and École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales - EHESS, Paris. "Research as a discursive practice. Doing quality in the social sciences and humanities"
  • Gabi LOMBARDO, Senior Scientific Officer for Social Sciences at Science Europe. "Towards a taxonomy of research output. The engagement of the Science Europe scientific Committees"
  • Catherine PARADEISE, Institut Francilien Recherche Innovation Société - IFRIS, Paris

Thursday 4th June Session 1 Academic and societal relevance of the SSH
  • Gunnar Sivertsen, NIFU, Norway. “The balance between internationalisation, language, societal relevance and quality in research evaluation in the SSH”
  • Dagmar Simon, WZB, Germany. “Scientific quality and social relevance in the social and spatial sciences: visible?
    Measurable
    ?”
  • Thed van Leeuwen, U. of Leiden, The Netherlands; Alesia Zuccala, U. of Copenhagen, Denmark;
    Rens Bod, U. of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.  “Current day infuences of Humanities research on other scientic domains”
  • Jon Holm, Forskningradet, Norway. “What’s in it for the Faculty? Experiences from planning a national evaluation of
    Humanities research in Norway
    ”

 Thursday 4th June Session 2. Diversity and clusters in the SSH

  • Ad Prins, Consultant, The Netherlands ; Jack Spaapen, KNAW, The Netherlands. “Hybrids and diversity in the SSH”
  • Frederik Verleyssen & Tim Engels, U. of Antwerpein, Belgium. “Clustering of authors through the analysis of their publication patterns”
  • Alexander Hasgall, U. of Geneva, Switzerland. “Evaluation from the botttom up? Dealing with multiplicity in the SSH”
  • Thomas Kadelbach & Joanna Domingos, U. of Neuchâtel, Switzerland “Collaborations and partnerships in the SSH in the mirror of research projects”

Thursday 4th June Session 3. Bottom-up criteria for the SSH

  • Ana Ramos, Maria Armenia Carrondo, FCT Lisbon, Portugal ; Claudia Sarrico, U. of Lisbon, Portugal “A bottom-up approach to building a publication indicator for the SSH”
  • Jorge Mañana-Rodriguez, Elea Giménez-Toledo, CSIC, Espagne. “Components of book publishers’ quality: prestige, specialisation and peer review”
  • Ginevra Peruginelli, "ITTIG-CNR, Italy. Quality in legal science: the case of evaluating legal monographs”

Thursday 4th June. Roundtable “Collaborations and societal impact of SSH research”

  • Speakers: Alexandre Hasgall, U. of Geneva, Switzerland, Michael Ochsner, ETH Zürich and FORS, Switzerland, Silvia Martens, U. of Lucerne, Switzerland, Thomas Kadelbach, U. of Neuchâtel, Switzerland, Jack Spaapen, KNAW, The Netherlands

Friday 5th June. Session 4. National evaluation protocols and methods

  • Emanuel Kulczycki, U. of Poznan, Poland. “Humanities and Social sciences: a case of parametric evaluation in Poland”
  • Aline Waltzing, EHESS, France. “The invention of evaluation: systems and self-definitions in the evaluation of research and higher education in France and the Netherlands since the 1980s”
  • Antonio Ferrara, Andrea Bonaccorsi, ANVUR, Italy “How robust is journal rating in the SSH?”

Friday 5th June. Roundtable “Autoévaluation et démarche qualité, des outils de valorisation des projets en sciences humaines et sociales”

  • Speakers: Thierry Bontemps, CNRS, France, Sabine Goulin, U. de Lorraine, France, Hélène Boullanger, U. de Lorraine, France

Friday 5th June. Sessions 5. Bottom-up criteria for the SSH (2)

  • Michael Ochsner, ETH Zürich and FORS, Switzerland & Sven Hug, ETH Zürich, Switzerland. “Evaluation criteria in the humanities: preferences for traditional and modern conceptions of research as a matter of scholars’ characteristics”
  • Silvia Martens, Wolfgang Schatz, U. of Lucerne, Switzerland & Désirée Donzallaz, U. of Fribourg, Switzerland. “Criteria and indicators for visualising theological research and evaluating its quality – a bottom-up approach”
  • Birgitte Martens, Walter Ysebaert, Free university of Bruxelles, Belgium. “The ECOOM-evaluation framework design for artistic research in Flanders: community building, discipline building and stakeholder-driven indicator design for research evaluation”

Friday 5th June. Session 6. Dissemination and impact the SSH

  • Emilia Aiello, Mar Joanpere, U. Barcelona, Spain & Joan Cabré, U. Rovira I Virgili, Spain. “Advances in the evaluation and visibility of the social impact of the SSH. The social impact open repository initiative”
  • Jens Maesse, U. of Warwick, United Kingdom “Elitism in economics”
  • Damien Besancenot, Jean-Michel Courtault & Abdelghani Maddi, U. de Paris 13, France. “Citations, notoriété et qualité scientifique : Le cas des revues en sciences économiques. ”

Saturday 6th June. Session 7. Metrics and beyond

  • Thed van Leeuwen, Clifford Tatum, Leiden university, the Netherlands. “Open access publishing in the Netherlands in an international perspective using bibliometric techniques”
  • Alessia Zuccala, U. of Coppenhagen, Denmark. “Inciting the metric-oriented Humanist, or how to teach bibliometrics within a faculty of Humanities?”
  • Solange Chavel, Alessandro Mosca, Victor Pascual, Sabine Plaud, Bernardo Rondelli & Sebastian Stride, SIRIS Academic SL, Spain. “Beyond metrics: the influence of structure and behaviour on research visibility”
  • Ad Prins, Support in Research Management, the Netherlands, Rodrigo Costas, Thed van Leeuwen, Paul Wouters, CWTS, Leiden, the Netherlands. “Using Google scholar in research evaluation of SSH programs”

EvalHum  
Contact: EvalHum  
Webmaster: EvalHum  
Date de mise à jour : 14-09-2014
 
RNMSH
MSHB
EvalHum

Email

  • evalhum@evalhum.eu

Registered address

icon

Manoir de Kerfloc'h, 56320 Priziac, France

Follow us

On Facebook

On Twitter




Our sincerest thanks to the creators of the free web template found at: http://www.free-css.com/

Copyright (c) www.evalhum.eu. All rights reserved. < www.alltemplateneeds.com >
Images From: www.photorack.net